Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/August Ferdinand Black


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 21:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

August Ferdinand Black

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No apparent significant coverage in WP:RS to satisfy WP:GNG. Vague assertion of "several" written scripts without the ability to verify claims, and the inability to source the statement about his works being "well received by literary critics" indicate the subject does not meet WP:AUTHOR. The lack of any verifiable biographical information (real name? date of birth?) makes this a highly unencyclopedic WP:BLP. Kinu t /c  07:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Awfully skimpy piece of WP:SPAM created by a WP:SPA afflicted with WP:COI and possible WP:AUTO, insufficient in WP:RS, thus failing WP:AUTHOR and, by virtue of insignificant micro-press publication, WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 10:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  —Mais oui! (talk) 09:07, 30 January 2011 (UTC) --Mais oui! (talk) 09:07, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.