Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auguste Corteau


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nakon 01:16, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Auguste Corteau

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of the article has requested deletion of articleabout self - at OTRS TicketID=8262087. I have no opinion on the notability of the subject.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  13:21, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I would like to know the reason for pulling out db-g7 tag. Dormantos (talk) 16:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * You can add db-g7 with two curly brackets on both sides. That is used for self-deletion. Dormantos (talk) 15:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Dormantos g7 is for the creator of the article requesting deletion. The subject of the article is not the creator.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  02:05, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  13:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Corteau has written 14 books and won at least two awards, so would appear to pass WP:GNG with flying colours. Theroadislong (talk) 13:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 *  Delete Neutral If the person himself wants to pull himself out, I don't think any further discussion is needed. Dormantos (talk) 15:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC) I have voted neutral in light to withdrawing db-g7 by User:Flat Out Dormantos (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Disregard comments by sockpuppet of blocked account. postdlf (talk) 01:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep He does appear to be notable and (I think that) we don't give any information that isn't on his official website where our Wikipedia article is mentioned.  We can't read his mind about why he wants this deleted, but it seems to me that he's already thoroughly "outed".  --Hordaland (talk) 17:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment The user wrote this on my talk page "It's just that I'd really like the article, the whole thing, removed, so that if I actually one day become worthy of a mention in Wikipedia, it won't be a botched-up thing bearing a horrendous (where'd they find it???) photo." Though as above I think he already is notable enough and perhaps we can find a better photograph with his help/ Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.