Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augusto Scalbi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Well it's been a week since sources have been added and no one's refuted them or whatever so closing as Keep, Don't usually close on one !vote however the next relist would only gain another !Keep so wrapping it up as Keep (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Augusto Scalbi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Racing driver that does not meet the WP:NMOTORSPORT criteria, and has not received significant coverage from reliable sources. QueenCake (talk) 21:08, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Nomination. Seems pointless, about an unknown racing driver. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment – Sources clearly denote that the subject is not "unknown". North America1000 04:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 9 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as no context for any better notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:19, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment – Using the Find sources template atop this nomination provides evidence that the subject is not "unknown" nor that he exists as having no "context". For example, see this source and this source for starters. North America1000 04:04, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – The subject meets WP:BASIC. Source examples include, but are not limited to:, , , , , . North America1000 04:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisted to give people time to evaluate the recently-presented sources. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:48, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 21:48, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.