Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aural space


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against merging, please contact me if you would like the content retrieved. Nakon 00:46, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Aural space

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another term that comes across as a dictionary term. (and besides this kind of is covered already in Comfort noise) Wgolf (talk) 02:16, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:37, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary.--Rpclod (talk) 14:19, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge into Soundscape. The three sentences do not merit an article, but the phrase is a likely search term. Pax 05:22, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.