Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurelius Chen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 21:47, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Aurelius Chen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem sufficiently notable - effectively, his resume consists of him being the head/deputy head of CCP organs in a corporation, and it is not clear to me that the current position is itself sufficiently notable. Delete unless shown otherwise. --Nlu (talk) 17:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 01:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  04:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Nothing obviously better. SwisterTwister   talk  20:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I am not able to evaluate the importance of the positions one way or another, & I canot read the sources.  DGG ( talk ) 01:40, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.