Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aureobel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:17, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Aureobel

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Record label with no indication or evidence of notability. No independent sources found. Deskford (talk) 15:37, 21 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Deskford (talk) 15:46, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. No indication of notability. Christopher Connor (talk) 00:39, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.