Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurora (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 12:29, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Aurora (novel)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

An article on a non notable self published book. Already contested at prod. A search on author and tile returns 19 unique GHits, including Wikipedia. None of these are in depth or reliable, hence notability cannot be established. Nuttah (talk) 12:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: No sources suggest notability. Mr_pand [ talk | contributions ] 13:32, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: Even though it does actaully come up with hits when you use and engine search, I think the best way is to upgrade or renew the site so it is a more reliable source.Though since it actual is for sale and in consumer hands, it should be kept up.Luxlow (talk) 14:21, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:14, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Author does not yet meet our notability guidelines, but I respect his passion for his work and hope he has great satisfaction and success. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.