Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurora (programming language) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-26 08:54Z 

Aurora (programming language)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable software for writing programs (and the programming language used to write them). Fails WP:SOFTWARE - Google for Aurora "Ionic Wind Software" shows a lack of multiple independent, reliable sources that have detailed mentions of the software. The majority of hits go to download sites and file directories. Was nominated before; article has changed little since then and the software is no more notable now. Awyong J. M. Salleh 14:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Inadequate references/sources. WMMartin 14:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP should cover only sufficiently established languages, those that fail this criterion would lead to unmaintainable articles. As Aurora is officially in beta I do not expect it being established enough. In the future this status may change. Pavel Vozenilek 19:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.