Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurora Aquino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 11:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Aurora Aquino

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD is being removed by IP users. Deletion rationale: "Only notability is derived from family members, and notability is not inherited." Ducknish (talk) 20:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete There is a minor claim of notability in the words "prominent opposition figure" (if that was, indeed, talking about Aurora. It was hard to keep all the references to "Aquino" without first names straight), but that claim is not supported by any sources.  I agree that most of this notability, if there is any, is inherited.  -- ShinmaWa(talk) 22:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. I, too, had trouble keeping the names straight. I took a look around at some US-centric articles for guidance. It appears parents of Presidents usually get articles, but not grandparents of Presidents or parents of Senators. An article similar to Family of Barack Obama might be in order for this family. Location (talk) 02:27, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, as notability is not inherited. However, it can be said that the Aquino-Cojuangco family is notable as a whole, due to there being a lot of coverage for the family itself, so if an article can be made for the family, then she can have a mention there. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Naruta, etc. The family is notable as a whole, but this woman was not. Bearian (talk) 22:48, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.