Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurotype


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep (Non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 18:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Aurotype

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete unsourced one-liner about a photographic printing technique, without indication really what it is, why it differs from others, whether this is a trade name pushed by one company, or anything approaching notability assertions. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:37, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep I added additional content describing the chemical components of this historical process, the category to which it belongs and its notable discoverer, with two external references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.230.141.215 (talk) 08:50, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep stub article that has moved beyond one line and is now sourced/referenced. More can be done to improve though. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Stub on notable topic, it is referenced now. --Itub (talk) 08:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep There's really no reason for this to be deleted. The article is now referenced properly and passes WP:N. -- RyRy5 ( talk  ♠  copy-edit ) 06:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.