Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Graves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. per WP:SNOW. J.delanoy gabs adds 04:05, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Austin Graves

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This appears to have been created by the subject of the article, thereby creating a conflict of interest. The subject of the article may well be notable, but the article ought to be written by someone else. - Richard Cavell (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - IMDB has her credited a few times as "uncredited" or "Bikini model" and such. Apart from the COI problem, she appears to be a non-notable extra.   SIS   00:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment There seems to be 2 AFDs open for this article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Richard Cavell and myself had the same idea at the same time, I think. My entry (the 2nd nomination) should be gone now. If not, please remove it.  SIS   00:18, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I put a G7 tag on it and untranscluded it from the log. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks!   SIS   00:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. COI, WP:N, doesn't seem to be in anything much notable. Bsimmons 666  (talk) Friend? 01:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's no indication how extensive the appearance in sports illustrated was and the film parts are all non-speaking extra parts. Notability is not established. I would like to point out that using COI to require someone else to write the article is needlessly bureaucratic. It gives everyone extra work when we could just as easily keep an eye on the article and make sure it remains neutral (which is the issue with most COI articles) - Mgm|(talk) 09:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree to all above.  abf  /talk to me/  14:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not notable. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 08:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.