Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Huizenga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Austin Huizenga

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable sports individual, viz WP:SPORTCRIT. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Jim  Car  ter  11:37, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Jim  Car  ter  11:38, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.  Jim  Car  ter  11:38, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 12:38, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 12:38, 29 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Completly irrelevant player in lower tier junior ice hockey leagues. He has not achieved anything notable. He fails WP:SPORTCRIT and specifically WP:NHOCKEY in all points. There are a few passing mentionings on him on some non-notable webpages, but its not enough to pass WP:GNG. Most of the article is pretty much trivia, especially the lead. It should therefore be deleted. Dead Mary (talk) 14:02, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails NHOCKY as well as GNG. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 15:08, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:56, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - not finding any evidence of notability, either through receiving significant coverage nor from meeting WP:NHOCKEY. Even if this subject was notable, the article would need substantial revision as it currently reads as a resume.  Rlendog (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.