Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Jelfs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Currently no obvious redirection target, if/when that article is created (in line with other counties) would recommend an editorial decision to redirect should be taken. Daniel (talk) 13:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Austin Jelfs

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, nothing in coverage. Störm  (talk)  13:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Once again, longevity at a low level does not make him notable.  RobinCarmody (talk) 21:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. As with so many other articles incorrectly listed for deletion, passes WP:CRIN by virtue of having played List A cricket. Once again, longevity at a low level is irrelevant to whether he passes WP:CRIN- but playing a List A match is. DevaCat1 (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Lincolnshire County Cricket Club List A players Has played 1 List-A match, but no coverage. Using a similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY where players with 1 or a few matches but no coverage, are deleted/redirected. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:00, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete There's no coverage of him, which fails WP:GNG and is strange considering the article claims that he made his List-A debut in his early 40s. SportingFlyer  T · C  01:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the article completely and totally fails GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. No WP:SIGCOV; only wide-ranging databases, scorecards, etc. In fact fails all notability criteria including the very weak NCRIC; there is no automatic list-A—highest-level equivalence, and minor counties is very much below that standard irrespective of the opponents and competition status. No suitable list to merge/redirect into. wjematherplease leave a message... 13:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG, the single List-A appearance doesn't seem to be covered by any substantial source. -- Ashley yoursmile!  18:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.