Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Kincaid (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The "keep" position is weakened by not addressing Kevin's reply to Arkelweis.  Sandstein  19:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Austin Kincaid
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 10:53, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable by any measure. Kevin (talk) 11:48, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as per last AfD; also, satisfies WP:PORNBIO (Has received nominations for well-known awards in multiple years) and possibly WP:ENTERTAINER (Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following; 'pornbio' is an additional sub-bit of 'entertainer') --Arkelweis (talk) 15:13, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * However Kincaid only received nominations in 2007, and so does not meet the criteria. Kevin (talk) 00:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Arkelweis. -- Cycl o pia -  talk  00:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom's analysis. Fails WP:PORNBIO since all nominations came in same year, not mutiple years.Nothing in aricle or sources indicates any other basis for notability or potential for subsantive article expansion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:05, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom - A l is o n  ❤ 04:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.