Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Meadows


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn You learn something new every day. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124; © &#124; WER  17:02, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Austin Meadows

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Too soon. Fails WP:GNG at this time. Insufficient significant coverage from independent sources. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 13:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Even these few sources count as reliable. There is a lot of coverage of him. Citrusbowler  (talk) (contribs) (email me)  15:40, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Meadows is a first-round pick and a High School All American, are there are many sources (some of which I am adding as we speak!) containing information on him. If Clint Frazier is still an article, why shouldn't this be? Mpejkrm (talk) 23:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright, thank you. I'm still pretty new to this, have to get adjusted to all the WP pages and everything. I appreciate it. Mpejkrm (talk) 16:38, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I think it's too soon to decide on this guy.. If he signs i'd say merge to the minor league player page... if he doesn't then delete because I don't feel high school baseball players are notable. All the sources are from draft profiles which don't provide in-depth converge. Spanneraol (talk) 14:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Appears to meet WP:GNG. – Michael (talk) 22:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Neutral as of now I created a bunch of articles on top draft choices before the draft happened, but I passed on creating this one because I didn't see nearly enough sources. Now, there are some sources, and it might be enough to get over GNG, but I'm not sure. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 20:40, 24 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NHSPHSATH. Subject received national honors as an All American, which indicates that he has received, as an individual, substantial and prolonged coverage that is neither routine nor trivial.--TM 13:28, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.