Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Osueke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Petros471 12:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Austin Osueke
This article is about the founder of Eigomanga. An article already exists for the company. Outside of this context, he is not particularly notable; most of the article is about his various jobs, such as a translator and consultant. None of the material in the article is referenced, and it generally reads as a vanity article, especially if the edit history is taken into account. A Google search yields only about sixty or so references to Eigomanga's Austin Osueke, most from press releases. Very few articles link to this article, all of which appear to have been linked after-the-fact by editors to this article. In short, if the subject of this article should be mentioned at all, it should be in the Eigomanga article (perhaps this could be redirected there). --Slowking Man 08:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions.   -- Neier 11:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per not notable WP:Vanity Hello32020 19:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Eigomanga. Entirely unsourced so we can't verify claims, not sure if he's notable enough. VegaDark 19:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. In agreement with reasons stated: unverifiable due to no sources, not notable, vanity. The subject here is already mentioned in the Eigomanga article. - Kitness 06:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with the addition that Eigomanga should also be deleted. Nither these articles make any assertions of notability and both articles appear to be vanity pages or possible advertisement. I highly doubt that this article will pass WP:BIO or that Eigomanga could pass WP:CORP. Also neither articles offers any kind of citations for the information contained within, leading to the posibilities that both articles are original research. And finally, there have been several anonymous IPs removing the AfD notice from this article and removing the citations missing tag from Eigomanga article. --TheFarix (Talk) 14:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't mind redirecting to Eigomanga, but Eigomanga was covered by Asian Week at the very least. On the other hand, it's hard to find sources other than that article.  It also has a partnership with a (local?) cable station but I can't find any news on it other than press releases.  ColourBurst 17:13, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * "Multiple" means more then one. So the single mention in Asian Week woudn't be enough. --TheFarix (Talk) 13:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.