Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Reaves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:15, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Austin Reaves

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not at all my field, but I thought the basic concept for college athletes in NSPORTS required more than this. In particular, the sources are all local, and therefore do not show " national media attention"  DGG ( talk ) 02:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable college basketball player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  20:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  20:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  20:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep passes WP:GNG. There are multiple independent sources covering the subject in detail.--User:Namiba 20:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly meets GNG with sources in the article. Not fair to say all the coverage is local, as there is coverage from several different papers and not just from Oklahoma. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 02:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep – Easily meets WP:GNG and the article is well sourced to prove it. The coverage is from at least four different states. Poor nomination. Rikster2 (talk) 09:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per all above. Ejgreen77 (talk) 06:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Rikster.2604:2000:E010:1100:A4DE:20C7:2173:888 (talk) 05:06, 21 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.