Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australasian Tunnelling Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  05:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Australasian Tunnelling Society

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

They're a real organization. There are a few reference in Gnews to them (both in passing.) A surprising number of regular Google hits. The article does read a bit like a PR piece, and the creator's username makes me wonder if there is a COI thus the tag. Mr. Vernon (talk) 07:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve the article. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 07:06, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep It may well be COI, but we routinely keep article for major professional organizations. Just leave the sourcing tag in place. I put a proper category on page, Nom or others can click if they want to look at the many similar pages we have.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note that I added a sentence and a solid source from a professional journal. This is an obvious, almost procedural keep.  References  (mostly stuff like studies, conferences it has sponsored) can be found in searches of scholarly & professional journals. It would be better to have someone actually come in and write a good article. Until that happens, however, I believe that we can keep this article as valid, if sadly brief. E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:26, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Withdraw the AfD as keep, please. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.