Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australia–Belarus relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. BJ Talk 00:20, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Australia–Belarus relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination from the obsessive creator. Aust govt describes trade as modest. also no mention of any bilateral agreements non resident ambassadors.google news search doesn't reveal much except they've competed in the same sporting competitions. LibStar (talk) 07:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Canley (talk) 08:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - aside from press releases issued by the Belarusian regime, there ain't much there. - Biruitorul Talk 14:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability and not a directory or random collection of information. Better to have 200 sections or articles on "Foreign relations of ..." for each sovereign nation than about 20,000 random pairings which merely regurgitate information from the websites of the foreign ministries, and which will quickly become stale and outdated. Edison (talk) 15:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Google news search turns up more sports articles than any nation-combi-nation that I've seen so far. Rowing, tennis, women's basketball, gymnastics, etc.-- but no diplomatic games. Mandsford (talk) 21:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per my usual standards - no appreciable contacts between the two nations. Bearian (talk) 00:25, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. More Australia-Foobar relations cruft. WWGB (talk) 03:16, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, not likely to be found so. This article borders on being a mere dictionary entry. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  17:19, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.