Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australia national under-23 football team 2008 Olympic Games campaign


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''Snowball delete. Note to all those describing this as admin negligence - the article was deleted five days after the prod notice was placed on it. This deletion was then contested and the article was restored without the prod notice, as per standard procedures. As such it needed an AfD nomination to be again considered for deletion. There was no tardiness or negligence on anyone's part in this process' Grutness...wha? '' 02:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Australia national under-23 football team 2008 Olympic Games campaign

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested Prod (prod removed after 12 days of being uncontested). There is no need for an article of this type. The information is practically all duplicated from Australia national under-23 football team, 2007 Lunar New Year Cup, Football at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Men's qualification and Football at the 2008 Summer Olympics. Anyone can see Australia's involvement in the Olympics from those articles, so there is no need for a separate article just about them. Nfitz (talk) 19:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as original prodder. I can't believe this went for a whole week after the prod expired without being deleted. Sort yourselves out, admins! – PeeJay 19:17, 29 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree with above. No need for page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drkshadowmaster (talk • contribs) 19:27, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as deserving of deletion under prod. I've asked at the Village Pump about perhaps being able to delete this now, without waiting for AFD, because the prod expired.  Nyttend (talk) 19:32, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. – PeeJay 19:34, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as doubly expired PROD. Admins asleep at the switch! DarkAudit (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Where is this listed at WP:CSD? I don't believe this is a criterion. Thanks, -- Mizu onna sango15 / Discuss 20:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I wasn't invoking any criteria. Just noting that the standard PROD waiting period had pass more than twice over. Combine that with the lack of anyone coming to the article's defense, and we have a snowball beginning to roll. DarkAudit (talk) 01:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Deltete, as this should have been prod-deleted straightaway by admins. -- Mizu onna sango15 / Discuss 20:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:55, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:55, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above reasons. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  21:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Piling on for all the reasons above. -- Quartermaster (talk) 22:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.