Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Geographic Society Adventure Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Australian Geographic Society. v/r - TP 01:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Australian Geographic Society Adventure Awards

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD, No indication that this is a notable award.Fails WP:GNG Mt  king  (edits)  04:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. The Australian Geographic awards are notable to Australians, as they recognise the extraordinary achievements of Australian adventurers. I created this list because I found the amount of detail listed on the Australian Geographic website about each achievement to be lacking - especially in the earlier years. The article is sufficiently referenced and accurate. I have strong objections to the article being deleted, however would support a merger with the parent article. Bezza84 (talk) 05:55, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. It asserts notability and it confirms it with many references. I see not reason to delete this article. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  07:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Which refs - the refs are about the named persons ? - look at the links at the top of this page, and I can find nothing that addresses the subject of the awards in significant detail as required by WP:GNG. Mt  king  (edits)  07:58, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Some of the references to individuals clearly consider the award important enough to mention. I am surprised that the award itself has not been noticed more, but I have not really looked. For now, a merge will keep the material until it can be recreated as the article gets larger and more specific references are found. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  22:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge I don't think the awards themselves are notable. BTW Australian Geographic Society is only a small article, so I think it'll be better if the two get merged. Sp33dyphil  "Ad astra" 08:22, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Sounds Useful, though i dont see a reason for deletion a Merge into the Australian Geographic Society will benefit both. Considering the size of the Australian Geographic Society this merge as discussed by Sp33dyphil  should be worth considering.   Doctor muthu's muthu    wanna talk ? 12:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge – to Australian Geographic Society, which will also improve and expand the Australian Geographic Society article. Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.