Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Indoor-Rules Quiddich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 06:47, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Australian Indoor-Rules Quiddich
nn even if not made up (see first cited website). Also a copy vio. Just delete this entire mess. Gator (talk) 20:17, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.Gator (talk) 20:17, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as copyvio, speedy delete if appropriate. 82 hits for Australian Indoor-Rules Quidditch and nothing indicating notability as a sport, fictional or not. . Capitalistroadster 22:36, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  . Capitalistroadster 22:44, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * You do good work, CR, but I'd like to point out that "Australian Indoor-Rules Quiddich" has nothing to do with Australia. It's just that American uni students recognise our sheer awesomeness ;-) &mdash; fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 03:46, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not even Pottercruft: it's a one-time gag from a single MacHall strip . Oh, and it's a copyvio, of course... &mdash; Haeleth Talk 23:05, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Roisterer 00:43, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, can't even spell Quidditch; non-notable. Jtmichcock 02:14, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.Sarah Ewart 02:47, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Hey, I like Mac Hall as much as the next red-blooded university-aged geek, but ... no. Unencyclopaedic, not even worth a merge.  Maybe a redirect? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 03:46, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Hey, I like Mac Hall as much as the next red-blooded university-aged geek, but ... no. Unencyclopaedic, not even worth a merge.  Maybe a redirect? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 03:46, 24 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.