Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Worldwide Exploration


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Non-admin closure as permitted by policy for a clearly unanimous result. YechielMan 01:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Australian Worldwide Exploration
Does not meet WP:CORP, fails to demonstrate notability and has not been edited since creation. Thewinchester (talk) 10:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  -- Thewinchester (talk) 10:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - it's listed on the S&P/ASX 200, i.e. it is one of the top 200 companies in Australia by market capitalisation. As a listed company, there's bound to be external coverage. MER-C 12:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Mer-C.Garrie 02:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Google News has a number of articles and Google News Archive has over 1,000 articles  so it meets WP:CORP. Capitalistroadster 02:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, "The company has a market capitalisation greater than AU$1.2 billion". Definitely notable.  A speedy almost.  Lankiveil 08:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Strong Keep - a Stock Exchange quoted company ought to be notable.  Peterkingiron 23:02, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.