Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian governments and Indigenous Australians


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:22, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Australian governments and Indigenous Australians
I'm not sure what this article is trying to achieve, but as it stands it is unacceptable for Wikipedia. cj | talk 06:40, 29 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- cj | talk 07:02, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, though I can't help but think someone will come along and say otherwise. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 06:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing but a shit-slinging article with no real purpose. This topic is better covered in other articles relating to Indigenous Australians. michael talk 06:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge anything important (if any) into the Torres Strait Islanders article -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 06:47, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge anything useful to Indigenous Australians or Torres Strait Islanders. Australian history seems very deplorable to me (like a lot of history, actually,) but this is unsourced POV soapboxery, and I'm not sure what it's really trying to acheive, either. Grand  master  ka  07:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing useful to merge, so save the closer the trouble. Ambi 08:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, uncyclopedic content. --Ter e nce Ong 14:41, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. This topic is covered much better elsewhere. Capitalistroadster 19:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for above reasons, agree with Michael, Ambi and Roadster that there is nothing salvageable. --Scott Davis Talk 13:19, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete verging on being an attack page which give grounds for speedy deletion. -- Ian &equiv; talk 01:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have read almost this exact entry as part of a larger Wikipedia article (although I can't remember whoch one).  --Roisterer 03:55, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 19:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.