Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian network for art and technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. Shalom Hello 22:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Australian network for art and technology

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The original article, as written by a user whose name is identical to the article's name, contained a copyvio. User:DGG solved that problem, but the author's WP:COI ruins the potential neutrality and notability of the article. Shalom Hello 02:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The Australia Council is one outside attesting to notability. A Google News Archives search comes up with others such as this and this . Capitalistroadster 03:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 03:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per the wired.com link, which attests to notability Corpx 05:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - A very highly notable organisation, as noted by the links proved above. COI in no way influences notability - neutrality, yes, but a topic remains notable regardless of who wrote it.  Giggy  Talk 22:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.