Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Authenticity and Development Front


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of armed groups in the Syrian civil war. SarahStierch (talk) 01:58, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Authenticity and Development Front

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This Syrian opposition group does not appear to have been the subject of significant coverage in third party sources as required by WP:ORG. I was not able to find reliable, secondary sources any better than what is already in the article. VQuakr (talk) 01:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment Additional Arabic sources include: -- Green Cardamom (talk) 04:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I saw a couple of those, and two have English language translations available I think. In your opinion, are any of them reliable and independent of the topic while covering the topic in sufficient depth to connote notability? VQuakr (talk) 04:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 03:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 04:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete not enough sources. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 07:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ..or Redirect per Bushranger below. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 05:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of notability. RichardStevens89 (talk) 09:43, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of armed groups in the Syrian civil war - there's enough to WP:V this as one of those, and it's a plausible search term. Redirects are cheap. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's relevant, BBC source says it numbers 13,000. 5 sources used so far, article needs more time to develop. DylanLacey (talk) 03:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * WP:ITSNOTABLE, WP:BIGNUMBER. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect as proposed by The Bushranger. I've looked through the Arabic-language sources, and they're fairly thin as well. No question this group merits an entry in list of armed groups in the Syrian civil war, but I don't think there's quite enough for a full article yet. —Neil 06:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.