Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autism and blindness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge whatever is deemed useful to Autism. Since I don't know how I'd best put it on the article, I just added the mergeto tag to it and will let someone who knows more handle the actual merge. - Bobet 14:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Autism and blindness
There are already separate articles on these. I don't see why there need to be this one. The source is a PDF that looks non-notable. Article is poorly written. I recommend we split it up into the Autism and Blindness articles that already exist. Beralighthand 14:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This isn't notable to have its own article; however, if relevant, inside the Autism article can contain a blindness section. --Porqin 14:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge anything useful into Autism and delete article. PJM 15:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge While the content of this article does seem to be drawn from the pdf file, there does seem to be several resources for autism and blindness here including books on the subject that have turned up in a google search. It looks like there is certainly enough for an article if someone wanted to write it. Keep if someone wants to clean it up and source it appropriately, otherwise merge the current useful information to the main Autism article.--Crossmr 16:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge Same reason as user PJM. Monkey Brain(talk) 22:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per User:PJM Stubbleboy 18:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge unless someone cleans this up and sources it better, per Crossmr. MarkBuckles 09:09, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge this decision was a "no-brainer" for me. --HResearcher 02:39, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.