Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AutoAdmit.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

AutoAdmit.com
Not notable; clearly fails WP:WEB. Google shows 107,000 hits, but all but 3 are at this site itself or its mirror, xoxohth.com. The only unrelated results are this Wikipedia article, another forum, and what appears to be an advertisement. Dylan 00:36, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertising --Xrblsnggt 19:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   05:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:SPAM ST47 11:31, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB and conspicuous absence of reliable sources. Just zis Guy you know? 20:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep' - 6,000,000 posts and tens of thousands of posters seems pretty notable to me. Alexa rating is 69k, this isn't exactly HIGH but I thought the general rule of thumb is that <100k is notable enough. It does need a cleanup, though. --Pyroclastic 14:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, but WP:WEB disregards the size of a forum or number of posters in determining notability; a forum is perceived as notable if others have commented on it in reliable sources, and for this site, none have (as I mentioned in the nomination). Without such sources to provide information on the subject, it would be impossible to expand this article beyond a stub and still maintain WP:V and WP:NOR, because we have no reliable information about the site to reproduce here. Dylan 23:12, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, JzG. Eusebeus 20:14, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete yet another unnoteworthy forum - Blood red sandman 13:38, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.