Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AutoLink 2.5


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. NSL E (T+C) at 04:38 UTC (2006-05-25)

AutoLink 2.5
I can't find any reference to an AutoLink program related to IM. This doesn't seem notable, but I'm not sure. speak togadren 02:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep this may be verifiable, though non notable. Funnybunny (talk/Counter Vandalism Unit) 02:55, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable software, even if it's verifiable. -- Kicking222 03:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn software. --Ter e nce Ong 04:29, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable. Couldn't find verifiable info anywhere. Amaas120 04:30, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability (software) ~Kylu ( u | t )  04:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanity programming ad, non notable. Rockpocket (talk) 08:17, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --MaNeMeBasat 09:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not notable, and since it's obsolete (can't be downloaded), it won't become so. --Kristjan Wager 11:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If it were notable, it should have got Ghits.--Jusjih 14:21, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete it wasn't notable when it was around, and you can't even download it anymore. M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 03:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.