Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auto Capture PC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  05:55, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Auto Capture PC

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article is about a non-notable piece of software. There is no coverage in reliable sources. The sourcing in the article is a primary source and some unreliable sources. See also Articles for deletion/Medo Abowarda. Whpq (talk) 16:05, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources WP:RS to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Googling suggests they don't exist. Article appears to have been created by the (currently blocked) author of the product WP:COI WP:SPA for WP:PROMOTION. Msnicki (talk) 16:07, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —Msnicki (talk) 16:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: By Googling the search keyword "Auto Capture PC", I found hundreds of resources over the web about this software, article was not created for WP:PROMOTION as the software is well known in most software directories. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.240.37 (talk) 02:12, 2 September 2011 (UTC) — 24.15.240.37 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * 24.15.240.37 (talk) has been blocked as sockpuppet of Medo3337 . Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Medo3337.  Msnicki (talk) 02:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: Seems to have plenty of mention on the web, including numerous mainstream sources. Certainly not "a list" but definitely not "z list" either. And COI/NOTE is not transitive. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - Could you share some of these sources with us? -- Whpq (talk) 12:04, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply - Please check the article references, also consider googling the keyword "Auto Capture PC". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.252.73 (talk)
 * Reply - None of the sources are reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 11:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply - There are reliable resources from well known websites such as download.com and softpedia.com as they appear in the article references.
 * Reply - Those are not reliable sources. They simply reprint the publisher's description and provide a download link. -- Whpq (talk) 12:45, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Reply - This website write a full article about the software without printing anything from the company website: http://3d2f.com/smartreviews/1-497-auto-capture-pc-an-efficient-parental-control-and-pc-monitoring-application-read.shtml Additionally, this is not article about a person, it's about a software product that's available online, you can easily verify information about the software in either the company website or in the software itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.217.124 (talk) 02:52, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * That website is not a reliable source WP:RS. The reviews aren't signed, there's no obvious editorial policy, it's impossible to tell who wrote the review, there's nothing there we can use.  Msnicki (talk) 03:31, 5 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: More references was added, the references show plenty of independent web pages reviewing the software product. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.252.73 (talk) 11:02, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: Please only !vote once. -- Whpq (talk) 11:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


 * 24.15.252.73 has been blocked for being an obvious sockpuppet.  D r e a m Focus  17:16, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


 * When you type "Auto Capture" on Google, Google will suggest you to search for "Auto Capture PC" as a first suggestion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.244.194 (talk) — 24.15.244.194 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete. References prove existence, not notability. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. The author of the article,, has been indefinitely blocked for abusing multiple accounts and a one-week hard block placed on the IP range 24.15.240.0/20 used by his sockpuppets. Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Medo3337.  Msnicki (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Msnicki (talk) 21:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete – the sources only show that it is for sale. Nothing independent written about it.  Dicklyon (talk) 01:43, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.