Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autobomb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 01:44, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Autobomb
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable unsigned band. Doesn't come close to meeting WP:MUSIC policy Secretlondon (talk) 07:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages:
 * (their EP)
 * (band member)
 * (band member)
 * (photo of guitarist)

Secretlondon (talk) 08:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep band article, delete all others including Category:Autobomb_albums. Googling for them, they are represented on many many pages. Couldn't find any that would suffice as a reliable source, so good references would still need to be found and added, but it seems the notability is definitely given, so the band article should be kept. As for the others, notability is not inherited, delete. ~ | twsx | talkcont | 11:11, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I get 850 Google hits searching for 'Autobomb band', which isn't a lot - and as noted above, there are no reliable sources included in that bunch. there's a lot of blogs that say they played on the same bill as Andrew WK and other notable bands, but with only one EP out and no buzz besides some blog chatter, they don't meet WP:MUSIC at present. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment if deleted, this should redirect to car bomb 132.205.99.122 (talk) 20:29, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.