Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autofocus assist beam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to autofocus. Coffee //  have a cup  //  ark  // 09:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Autofocus assist beam

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Unnotable photographic related definition. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Prod removed by User:Phil Bridger with note of "Contest deletion. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but this is not a dictionary definition." however it seems clear to me that it is in, indeed, a dictionary definition with no notability as a topic itself that would not already be covered in autofocus or camera in general. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 20:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge I've checked the article for 'autofocus', this would slot in quite easily as a section there. Also autofocus is a shorter article than you might expect, adding this wouldn't make it too long (it could do with more detail). --Brunk500 (talk) 09:56, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge I agree it is more than a dictionary definition, but it has no references and is an exceedingly narrow subject. I agree it would be a nice additional section to autofocus.-- SPhilbrick  T  23:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to autofocus, as while it is not notable enough to stand alone, it would complement autofocus. Airplaneman  talk 03:44, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.