Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autograph-2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:32, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Autograph-2

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NFF "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles. Budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film can be included in articles about its subject material. Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography after shooting has begun." Bazj (talk) 06:52, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  — Cliff smith  talk  15:09, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete withou prejudice, as the article is premature per WP:NFF. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 21:27, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, film not confirmed. If so, the start is more than a year away. Universal Hero (talk) 13:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.