Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automatic (Teairra Marí song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 12:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Automatic (Teairra Marí song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable songs: Lack significant coverage in reliable sources. Songs should only have an individual article when there is enough material to warrant a detailed article.R from song They could be redirected to the artist or the artist's discography as valid search terms. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:45, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:45, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 12:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Certainly lacks the notability for a standalone article, although no objection to redirecting to Teairra Marí discography. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 01:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Cause a Scene did at the very least chart. I believe there is potential for that. It may be that sources just need to be found from old magazines, newspapers, news website and entertainment websites. Rain  the 1  19:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Charting is not sufficient. Charting only suggests that a song may be notable. Significant coverage in multiple non-trivial independent sources is still required.WP:NSONG It must be demonstrated that such sourcing exists, not just speculation that it could or may. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 20:36, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I fully understand. Unless we look into it we will not know for sure. Personally may or could be due to a song charting is reasonable doubt not to hit the delete button. The article was created with minimal effort which put it in bad standing from the beginning. "Automatic" contains original research about the fellow singer Ashanti. I cannot find anything to support that claim. I cannot find much about it aside from blogs with bad editorial which are of no use here. The internet changes and sources disappear with link rot and such. I recall "Cause a Scene" gaining more coverage than this. Perhaps "Automatic" should be redirected and "Cause a Scene" given longer. Rain  the 1  02:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I searched for sources before starting this discussion. Don't just insist there could be sources, prove it. If significant coverage exists, then I have no problem with keeping the article. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 09:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  17:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.