Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automotive autoerotism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedily deleted as unsourced nonsense. (aeropagitica) 16:26, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Automotive autoerotism


Probable prank article. "Automotive autoerotism" and "Exhaustiophilia" get no Ghits. "Chanking" appears to be either someone's name or a slang term with a different meaning. Robotman1974 13:16, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. --SonicChao talk 13:24, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * On second thought, BJAODN. --SonicChao talk 16:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy BJAODN and Delete - crz crztalk 13:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I thought it might need speedy too, but I wasn't sure. I've still got the training wheels on. ;) Robotman1974 13:39, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN I have no words for this.  Canadian - Bacon  t  c 15:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD G3, joke articles qualify. BTW, do articles with misspelled titles qualify for speedy? autoerotism? Besides, title is a non sequitur, inanimate objects can't, ahem, you know.. Tubezone 16:21, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.