Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autopinger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Autopinger
Apparent vanispamcruftisement for not-notable webtool. 190 unique Google hits for this web-based product. Google link search returns 0 hits. Alexa rank = no rank. Does not meet WP:WEB or WP:CORP. Prod removed.--Fuhghettaboutit 21:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This site is a new technology of conducting blog ping and it is a new site that has not yet updated in google until the next google refresh. Google search for autopinger has 24,300 results. I m new to wikipedia and don't really know how to post this article but I m posting this article not for spamming, just to let people know that there is such a such technology. What are the guides that determine if the site could or not be listed in wikipedia? If it is based on Google statistics, then I m disappointed as I thought wikipedia is an open encyclopedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vinsonwang (talk • contribs).
 * Delete as non-notable per nom, WP:V, WP:SOFTWARE. --Satori Son 02:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Baseball,Baby!   balls  •  strikes  04:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete —  same, please look at the relevent policy. Thanks for your interest in contributing to wikipedia! —— Eagle (ask me for help) 05:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wiki is open but it's not a blackhole. No prejudice for recreation if the technology gains traction. 205.157.110.11 06:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Isn't this just what RSS does? --Xrblsnggt 18:49, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - if we just relied on Google for the information on this site, why have this Wikipedia at all?Intellectualprop2002 00:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.