Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autopsy Babies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  | Talk 18:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Autopsy Babies
Nominated for deletion by User:Grarap, who then forgot to write the actual nomination. I am doing it for him. No vote. J I P | Talk 17:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no claims to notability. Article claims to have been written about in FHM but I can't find that, Bizarre magazine article is very very short - 3 questions and a link to the website. No other coverage, no awards, no reason for inclusion Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 19:27, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N and seems like an effort to advertise products. Edison (talk) 04:16, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be promotional with little second source coverage other than personal blogs. Gigs (talk) 21:07, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.