Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AvaGlide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

AvaGlide

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The only things that I could find that weren't just mentions were both very brief. QuietCicada (talk) 13:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. QuietCicada (talk) 13:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not appear to pass the WP:GNG threshold for notability. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Eurogamer review (page 3) and a Kotaku video review  Oaktree b (talk) 16:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Two short reviews are not enough to pass the WP:GNG criteria. --Mika1h (talk) 08:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Eurogamer (around 3 sentences about the game itself) and Kotaku coverage (have watched the clip and it's pretty much a short showcase of the game rather than a review) does not represent a significant coverage of the subject. My searches else bring announces, passing mentions and databases. Fails WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.