Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Addams (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO Guerillero  &#124;  My Talk  05:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Ava Addams
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails updated version of WP:PORNBIO. Moreover as Hullaballoo Wolfowitz previously argued "Fails the GNG, no nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits, while the pop-culture namedrops are trivial, not the necessary substantive coverage. Just another porn performer BLP without reliably sourced biographical content". Finnegas (talk) 16:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Finnegas (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom as well as per my analysis in the previous AFD. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 13:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep The last deletion discussion was too recent and nothing has changed since then. Changing a guideline does not automatically make this individual any less notable. She still passes the "Has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre" criteria in PORNBIO for her work in the MILF genre and her nominations continue to be evidence of that. The "In popular culture" section of her article shows that she "Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media", also PORNBIO criteria. Not to mention that she also passes WP:ANYBIO, considering that fact that nominations haven't been removed from it and last time I checked, it hasn't been renamed to WP:ANYBIOEXCEPTFORPORNSTARS. Rebecca1990 (talk) 15:40, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Unique contributions to porn need acknowledgement by reliable or at least semi-reliable (like AVN) sources. I don't see that in the article and I can't find it in independent searches. A four-sentence mention in Complex magazine and a pop culture name drop fall short of the "featured" in multiple mainstream media standard. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Subject does not pass the general notability guideline, as noted by others. In the interests of improving the encyclopedia, the multi-nomination aspect of wp:pornbio is deprecated as far as I am concerned. Tarc (talk) 17:04, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails the new consensus guideline at WP:PORNBIO. Fails GNG without substantial reliable source coverage. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz is correct that the article lacks reliably sourced biographical content. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. One of many porn star bios and other articles related to the porn industry that fails the general notability guidelines. Thomas.W   talk to me  14:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as a GNG failure. Born in Gibraltar — get a DYK up on the mainpage quick!!! Carrite (talk) 03:44, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails GNG. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  03:41, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.