Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avaada Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Avaada Group

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP. References are routine funding news, annoucements, PR.  scope_creep Talk  00:42, 15 February 2023 (UTC) * Delete: As per nomination. --- 👑Misterrrrr👑 (talk) 06:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC) blocked as a sock. Akevsharma (talk) 15:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood (talk) 00:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Perhaps this should be posted in Wikiprojects relevant to India? I am unfamiliar with the sources used, so I'm not knowledgeable enough on the sources present to evaluate if they pass WP:RS for establishing notability Graywalls (talk) 05:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Coverage doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH thresholds. MrsSnoozyTurtle 12:02, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Assuming the sources meet WP:RS, they don't meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 16:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.