Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avalerion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Avalerion

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable sources Redtigerxyz (talk) 13:40, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   —Redtigerxyz (talk) 13:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.   —Redtigerxyz (talk) 13:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Thought could be a hoax after a look at google, but google books to the rescue.John Z (talk) 00:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced possible original research... If this article was sourced, then this issue can be revisited. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per John Z. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 05:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:34, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Article has now been sourced by John Z. ascidian  | talk-to-me  21:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Mythical birds, with sources of course, are notable. ~ priyanath talk 15:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Thank you John Z. &mdash; goethean &#2384; 00:04, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the thanks! I changed the article a bit. I think the problem was that it seems to be a bird of European mythology, that supposedly lived in India, not a part of Indian mythology, which was what made it look wrong.John Z (talk) 05:45, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep and Withdraw nomination as RS added.Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:24, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 21:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.