Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avalon Drive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Although there is agreement that this article still needs some work, the consensus is to Keep it. Liz Read! Talk! 02:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Avalon Drive

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article appears to fail WP:BAND and is written like a promotional material. I couldn't find much online on the band except for this one article from a reputable source; the other publications that I have found were mostly blogs or local/small online publications with questionable reliability. I'm not sure whether the Brisbane Times source alone would ensure notability. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 21:49, 21 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:57, 28 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:42, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 21:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 21:54, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I've add refs, content and provided some paring back of PoV material. More work is needed on the article. However the band is notable for its tours and releases, which are described by independent reliable sources.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 08:53, 24 July 2022 (UTC)shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 02:33, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * comment a musical band establish notability criteria and having citations from reliable resources. BBSTOP (talk) 04:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - They didn't accomplish much but they received some reliable newspaper coverage in their country while still together. The article could use some cleanup and removal of fan trivia, but there is enough coverage for a basic stub article. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 18:52, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as has reliable sources coverage such as Brisbane Times, AU Review and others so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.