Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avalon Family Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:13, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Avalon Family Entertainment

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Minor indie company; no evidence or assertion of notability for over three years now. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment I have added the "Hang On" tag in order to complete edits and improvements to the page. Nebulex (talk) 23:47, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Commment Hang on tags aren't appropriate for AFD's, only for speedy deletions.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 22:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete production company with one movie to its credit, which appears to itself not have been notable (possibly direct to DVD). Could become notable in the future, but doesn't pass WP:CORP at this time. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:51, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. Serves as promotion piece for subject (edited partially by company). I originally proposed it for deletion but template was removed by Nebulex - explanation given was not satisfactory. Nothing really changed since proposal.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:25, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * comment Nebulex appears to be a role account (keeps saying "we are new to this process" and the like), probably for Avalon. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:20, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was my suspicion even before those comments.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete one film only, and that one not particularly successful.    DGG ( talk ) 05:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete this one film production company. --Stormbay (talk) 03:15, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete If circumstances change and this production company gets some decent coverage or note for more projects, the article might be considered for undeletion. But at the persent time it fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.