Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avalum Naanum (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  04:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Avalum Naanum
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails the general and television-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  02:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 03:05, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. UtherSRG (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep. The independent non-interview sources are from The Times of India, which is only borderline reliable. However, the The Indian Express can be considered reliable. (Other sources like 5 and 11 are reliable). DareshMohan (talk) 09:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Plenty of RS. This MeToo related incident makes it notable. Kailash29792 (talk)  10:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep: : Source from Dinamalar, The Times of India , --P.Karthik.95 (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.