Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avani Soni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that there aren't sufficient sources that meet all of Sig Cov/reliable/independent to demonstrate notability Nosebagbear (talk) 11:48, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Avani Soni

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a procedural nomination from. The rationale seems to be "not notable". I am neutral Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete for now. Yet to establish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:8100:3982:582B:7FB:CB0E:D37C:7E82 (talk) 11:06, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   Oxon Alex    - talk  11:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   Oxon Alex    - talk  11:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:40, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:40, 23 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Dear wiki admins, this article has sourced from Times of India and Hindustan Times news agencies, both are reputable and verifiable, please consider before deletion. Thank you ☆★  Sunil Butolia   ( ✉✉ ) 13:37, 23 January 2020 (UTC)sunilbutolia
 * Note: Sunilbutolia is creator of the article in discussion. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:07, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as seems to have plenty of reliable sources coverage already in the article such as MidDay, Times of India and others so that WP:Basic is passed and deletion is not necessary,imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:04, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * delete I couldnt find significant coverage of the subject in secondary sources. Interviews can be considered, and mostly are primary, and most of the times: paid. WP:BASIC states: Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. All he sources used in the article are interviews except one, "cinestaan", which is a telly site. Cinestan doesnt establish notability either. A few posts about her looked like PR/paid. The article is discussion says She [the subject] is owner of FATC Entertainment which was established in 2011. It is possible that the subject is trying to create an image of herself in media with PR/paid stuff. Anyways, the subject fails general notability criteria because of the lack of significant coverage. Further reading: Interviews. PS: if someone says my arguement is inavlid, and that the subject has coverage, I request them to kindly provide the sources. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I struggled to find sig. coverage. I found one piece in Mid Day and some puffy stuff in the Times of India and something from a publication called Clout (appears to be an online magazine). But, not enough to convince me that she should have an article at this time. Missvain (talk) 22:55, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not enough reliable and neutral sources to establish notability. Most of these are promotional sources. Coderzombie (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - The subject of the article does not warrant a standalone page on Wikipedia cant see any in-depth coverage that can support this page. Sorry not now. - FitIndia  Talk Commons 08:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I originally PRODed this, and my opinion still stands, even thru that article has developed since. Not notable. Majavah (t/c) 17:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as paid for spam, creator Sunilbutolia has been blocked for UPE. MER-C 19:45, 28 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.