Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avant (skyscraper)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Avant (skyscraper)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looks very promotional. There are no sources online on this skyscraper, except for this Fails WP:GNG  AngusMEOW  ( chatter  •  paw trail ) 10:16, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Notability is not justified by available resources. fails GNG. Priyanjali singh (talk) 15:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete, does not meet WP:NBUILD, no awards, or sources found that contribute to wikinotableness, building size/height not wikisignificant (see here). Coolabahapple (talk) 02:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as well as above, poorly formatted and written, markup symbols in the text. Looks like a quick copy and paste job. Teraplane (talk) 00:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Not entirely true that no sources can be found, a quick Google search bagged me this and this; more could possibly be found on a more thorough trawl. I've not added those to the article yet, as they don't necessarily support the article content, since it seems the (what was intended as) residential building is being repurposed as hotel instead. If the article does survive, perhaps it could be edited in light of this info and these added as refs, but I do think the onus is on the creating editor to do that esp. as they've marked the article as 'work on progress'. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment It seems this could also be copypaste, as the content appears verbatim here. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if/when the copyvio issues are resolved, this building does not reach notability.  --Lockley (talk) 18:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.