Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avatar: The Legend of Korra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Avatar: The Last Airbender. No editors, including the nominator, are in favor of deletion, and the article has already been redirected. (non-admin closure) — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 15:47, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Avatar: The Legend of Korra

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete as per WP:CRYSTAL. The only evidence of this series even existing is a trademark filing and job listing by Viacom, neither listing any details about the show. Everything else has been speculation and rumors. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 20:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:27, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:27, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak keep: Sources look to confirm this pretty well and so WP:CRYSTAL wouldn't seem to apply. But really only toonzone would appear to be a solid RS.  Hobit (talk) 00:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep: Per deletion discussions at the article talkpage. Rehman(+) 01:29, 17 July 2010 (UTC) Commented below


 * What exactly in that argument is causing you to vote Keep? — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 03:29, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep: Per above comment by Rehman. Azeez talk 03:25, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge to Avatar: The Legend of Aang; it clearly hasn't even come close to being in production yet, and it does fall squarely under WP:CRYSTAL. Anything could happen between now and even principle production. Creators could get run over by a bus. Merge to the main article until it actually is at least somewhat produced, same as we would do with a future film. --  AnmaFinotera (talk  ~ contribs ) 03:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect: Redirect to parent article as said by AnmaFinotera above. Expand on redirect later when necessary. Rehman(+) 03:46, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge if you're going to keep any of the content. Jclemens (talk) 05:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I suggest a speedy closure of this deletion discussion. This is clearly now a merge/redirect discussion, and not a deletion. I will do the merging after closing of this discussion. Rehman(+) 07:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep: I say keep it you till September or October. Wait out the rumors and if there's nothing official by then just delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcguti (talk • contribs) 08:24, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Per comments above, I suggest temporarily turning the page into a redirect (to Legend of Aang) until considerable notability is gained. Rehman(+) 09:51, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge to Avatar: The Last Airbender. There just isn't enough to say about this at the moment to justify a separate article, and what is there is partly speculation. There's no need for a separate article on this at this time; it can always be restored when there's more information available. Robofish (talk) 15:26, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅; merged, and redirected page to Last Airbender. This discussion can now be closed. Rehman(+) 15:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect - Seeing as the general consensus is to redirect, and redirecting until the new series becomes notable seems like a viable option, I am changing my vote as the nominator from delete to redirect. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 15:46, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.