Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avaya Communication Servers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:42, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Avaya Communication Servers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Disputed prod of an apparently non-notable product. No unique  names  15:32, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Also nominating for the same reason:


 * Delete Both Per nominator, Puff pieces --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 19:57, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete both No notability beyond mere existence. § FreeRangeFrog 22:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete both and Salt as per my comments here. Stalwart 111  03:42, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep object to the wholesale removal of articles that were under the umbrella of the Nortel deleted wiki-project Ottawahitech (talk) 11:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Avaya Proactive Voice Quality Management, no opinion on Avaya Communication Servers. Avaya Communication Servers refers to a product family, and there seems to be a lot of resources online related to training materials and qualification for use of these systems. I do not see material that meets the WP:GNG though. Avaya Proactive Voice Quality Management, on the other hand, does not appear to have any coverage at all in third party sources and is a clear delete. VQuakr (talk) 03:45, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.