Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avaya IP Phone 1120


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Avaya IP Phone 1120

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable product. Also, the article consists mainly of technical detail. WP should not be used a service manual. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 21:50, 31 August 2011 (UTC)


 * keep but consider merging. Anyone who could use this as a service manual must be relying on imagination entirely, for these are merely the most general specifications. Too general even for an advertisement, but the correct amount of detail for an encyclopedia But in the normal course of things, such products are better merged into product classes  DGG ( talk ) 22:01, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * An editor has added numerous articles about Avaya products to such as extent that it has collectively become SPAM. It has skewed the coverage of technology towards that company. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:22, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:MILL. A single product like this has to be spectacularly original before it's notable for an individual article. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment How do we go about merging this page into Avaya 1100 series IP phones so many devices are covered in a single page, as recommended by DGG above? Geek2003 (talk) 21:37, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable, and I doubt the worth of a merge of the contents.  Velella  Velella Talk 12:13, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - catalog description, just another product from the company. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:55, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.