Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avenged Sevenfold's untitled seventh studio album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Avenged Sevenfold's untitled seventh studio album

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * Much WP:TOOSOON. Also fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NALBUMS. TheKaphox   T  17:59, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - with no title, there can't be an article title! That is a no-brainer to me. Once it gets a title, it can be a redirect until it meets notability requirements. Kellymoat (talk) 20:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * delete per nom surely there's a CSD for this sort of thing - David Gerard (talk) 09:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 *  Redirect - Redirect this page and "Voltaic Oceans" to Avenged Sevenfold per WP:CHEAP, and . --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Even though it has now been named, I still say delete. It is two months before it will be released. We do not know if it is will be notable or not. Too soon.Kellymoat (talk) 18:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 *  Comment - Because Voltaic Oceans is mentioned in the two articles that I listed above, it is likely to be a valid search term. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * But, if it ends up not being the title, the content of the correct article could say "originally planned to be titled". That way it shows up in a search.
 * Either way, there is no guarantee of notability for either (the album or the search term).
 * Kellymoat (talk) 08:59, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it's likely the album will be entirely article-worthy ... once there's a firm title and release date. But until then, (1) WP:CRYSTAL (2) this is actually unacceptable as a title - David Gerard (talk) 09:47, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I also think it is likely meet current wp standards for an article in the future. But not because it has a title and release date. Wikipedia isn't a running history of all things ever. It is an online encyclopedia, not every artist/album/song is important enough - and certainly not before their release.Kellymoat (talk) 10:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:HAMMER, which almost has the status of CSD. Bearian (talk) 20:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Neither the title of the album nor the release date have been reported or confirmed by the band or any record label with which they may be associated, this article is - so far - unfounded. Athies22 (talk) 04:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.